This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

BILLIONAIRE LEVERAGE
Why Your Best People May Be Doing Work the Company Should Have Eliminated Years Ago

One of the most expensive people in your company may not be your highest-paid executive.

It may be the brilliant person whose intelligence you are paying for — but barely using.

At Quantum Mogul, we have unfortunately seen this repeatedly.

Donal often walks into a company and meets experienced people who have been there for 10, 15 or 20 years. They are capable. Educated. They understand the business intimately.

And yet something has disappeared.

The challenge.

The curiosity.

Sometimes, even the belief that anything is going to change.

Donal notices all this before he ever gets to the process map.

Ask those people what the company is doing with new technology. Ask what they are exploring in AI. Ask what they believe could be done differently.

Some have, as Donal puts it, almost “given up.”

Others become frustrated because they can see what the company could be doing — and nobody is leading them there.

For Donal, that is when the fact-find moves upwards.

What is leadership doing?

Because before assuming you have a people problem, you may need to ask whether you have designed a company that prevents good people from doing valuable work.

Your problem may not be headcount. It may be the work.

Donal learned this lesson himself.

Early in his career, he made the mistake many CEOs still make today: when there was too much work, he assumed more people would solve it.

He no longer thinks that way.

Before adding headcount, he wants to know why the pressure exists.

Was the work properly planned?

Was it properly costed?

Were warnings ignored?

Has the company accepted business its operating model cannot efficiently deliver?

Why are people leaving?

Are employees working with what Donal calls “rhythm” — or are they working in panic?

That distinction matters.

Because panic creates consequences.

Overtime becomes weekend working. Costs rise. People burn out or leave. Replacements have to be recruited and trained. Backlogs increase. Customers wait longer.

And eventually the CEO hires even more people to compensate for a system that was badly designed in the first place.

Donal saw what changing the work could do

Around 20 years ago, Donal worked with a fruit-and-vegetable business turning over approximately €3 million annually.

He recalls it making around €150,000 in profit.

One of the first things that struck him was its inventory operation.

“It was completely 1930s,” he says.

Technology costing approximately €30,000 allowed work previously involving several people to be handled by one. Donal recalls reducing staffing by around five roles, representing approximately €150,000 in annual salary costs.

Then he looked at the warehouse.

Again, the operation was heavily dependent on manual processes and equipment that he believed automation could substantially reduce.

Further investment followed.

By Donal’s recollection, profit eventually rose from approximately €150,000 to more than €400,000.

The important lesson isn’t that every CEO should start cutting people.

It is almost the opposite.

Stop consuming human capability on work that no longer deserves it.

Don’t automate something that shouldn’t exist

This is where Donal’s approach becomes particularly interesting.

When a task is consuming his own time, his first instinct is often to delegate it.

Not necessarily because delegation is the permanent solution.

Delegation gives him distance.

For several weeks, he can observe the work instead of being buried inside it.

Does the task actually create value?

Should it still exist?

Could technology perform it better?

If the work isn’t useful, eliminate it.

If it is useful but can be automated, automate it — then give the person something more valuable to do.

And if valuable human judgement genuinely needs to remain, don’t remove it merely because technology makes automation possible.

That is very different from asking:

“What percentage of my workforce can AI replace?”

The better question is:

“Where is human intelligence creating enough value to deserve human time?”

Meetings can hide the same problem

At Quantum Mogul we are often suspicious of organisations where senior people spend enormous amounts of time talking, reporting and attending meetings without enough resulting action.

Instead, we value people who listen, ask precise questions and are intentional about what they say.

That suggests a remarkably simple test for your own executive calendar:

What existed after this meeting that did not exist before it?

A decision?

An action?

An owner?

A solved problem?

A valuable piece of information?

Or simply another meeting?

Five senior executives sitting in a room for two hours does not cost the company merely ten hours of salary.

It also consumes ten hours of whatever those people could have created instead.

Free your best people — then ask them where they should go

There is another mistake we believe CEOs make.

They discover somebody is capable of far more, free them from low-value work — and then immediately tell them what to do next.

Donal would ask them.

What do you see?

What would you like to do?

What could we build together?

And when exceptional people create meaningful growth, we believe they should participate economically in that growth rather than being under-rewarded for their contribution.

Because this isn’t ultimately a cost-cutting exercise.

It is a wealth-creation exercise.

You are taking scarce human capability away from activity that produces insufficient value and moving it towards activity capable of producing considerably more.

Donal’s final test brings the entire exercise back to economics:

Did we provide real value?

And did we get properly paid for that value?

Because your best people should not spend another year becoming more efficient at work your company should have stopped doing years ago.

❝

Three questions every Elite Gentleman Founder should ask this week:

1. Which of my most capable people are spending significant time on work that does not require their level of judgement, experience or intelligence?

2. Before I approve another hire, have I established that we genuinely lack capacity — or am I adding people to compensate for a process, meeting culture or operating model that should be redesigned?

3. If I gave my best people back 20% of their working week, what higher-value work could they create with it — and what would that be worth to the business?

WEALTH PRESERVATION
You’ve Spent 30 Years Building the Company. Why One Bad Deal Can Endanger the Entire Fortune.

An Elite Gentleman Founder is considering a new deal.

He calculates that he is putting €4 million into it.

He can afford to lose €4 million.

So he believes he knows his downside.

At Quantum Mogul, we would ask a different question:

If this deal goes completely wrong, what else can it reach?

Because the amount you invest and the amount of wealth you expose are not necessarily the same thing.

A personal guarantee is one example Donal is particularly wary of.

“You could have €20 million tied up in a personal guarantee,” he says, while focusing primarily on the few million euros visibly going into the transaction.

To us, this is where elite gentlemen founders can make an extraordinarily unsophisticated mistake.

They haven’t deliberately put all their eggs into one basket.

They have structured a deal that may quietly connect the basket to everything else.

Calculate what you can lose before calculating what you can make

When Donal examines downside, for example, he starts with the obvious financial exposures.

What capital are you putting in?

What have you borrowed?

What else have you guaranteed or exposed?

But he doesn’t stop at money.

There is another asset he believes founders chronically undervalue.

Time.

“Time is something you can’t buy back,” Donal says. “Currency can be printed at will. Time is a finite product.”

A bad deal can consume considerably more than capital.

Years can disappear trying to keep a struggling venture alive.

Financial pressure can begin affecting family life, quality of life, judgement and eventually the way the founder makes decisions.

That leads to a harder wealth-preservation question:

Could this deal put me into circumstances where I no longer have the freedom to make decisions according to the principles that created my wealth?

Some decisions should only be made once

Donal uses the example of an airport suitcase to explain how he protects himself from that problem.

At the airport, there is a frame for your cabin luggage.

Your suitcase fits.

Or it doesn’t.

Donal believes certain wealth principles should operate the same way.

“There are some decisions that should only be made once in your life.”

Establish your boundaries before the opportunity arrives.

Then test the opportunity against them.

For Donal personally, one of those boundaries is straightforward: he does not use personal guarantees.

His point is not that every gentleman founder must adopt precisely the same rules.

It is that repeatedly renegotiating your own risk principles when an exciting opportunity appears allows emotion to enter a decision you supposedly made rationally.

And one phrase should make you particularly alert.

“The upside is enormous.”

When asked how he prevents a €20 million opportunity from seducing him into threatening €50 million he has already created, Donal’s response is crystal clear:

“The upside is enormous is the red flag.”

Extraordinary upside doesn’t remove the need for scrutiny.

It increases it.

A deal can contaminate the empire without losing money

Financial exposure isn’t the only concern.

Who are you actually doing business with?

Who sits behind the immediate counterparty?

Where will your product or service ultimately be used?

What jurisdiction are you entering?

Donal recalls a striking example from approximately 12 years ago.

He was involved with a high-rise residential development when an apparently legitimate organisation expressed interest in a long-term corporate rental arrangement.

Something bothered him.

The company wasn’t familiar, and Donal wanted to understand why it was so interested in securing the property.

Further investigation led Donal and his team to conclude that the activities behind the proposed arrangement did not align with his values or the principles by which he was prepared to do business.

They walked away.

The contract could have generated income.

But the contract was not the whole deal.

The counterparty was part of the deal. The intended use was part of the deal. The potential consequence for everything associated with the property was part of the deal.

That is why Donal’s first immediate walk-away condition remains remarkably human.

The wrong people.

His second is jurisdiction.

If he is uncomfortable with the people involved or where and how the business will operate, the projected return doesn’t repair the problem.

Give your existing company a year

There is another number Donal wants established before a major commitment.

Liquidity.

For a substantial company, his personal rule is to retain enough liquidity to cover at least one year of wages, bills and suppliers.

Why?

Because the new deal isn’t the only thing capable of going wrong.

Your existing company can slow down.

Costs can rise.

Customers can disappear.

A geopolitical or economic shock can arrive.

The new venture can take considerably longer than anticipated.

“If you put that liquidity at risk,” Donal says, “you could bring down 30 years of hard work.”

The purpose of the reserve is not to eliminate risk.

It is to stop a problem elsewhere from immediately removing your ability to respond.

Protect the fortune before you pursue the next one

This is ultimately what Quantum Mogul’s approach to wealth preservation comes down to.

Not avoiding opportunity.

Not becoming so frightened of losing money that you stop creating it.

But refusing to let the excitement of the next deal quietly renegotiate the protection of everything the previous deals created.

Before signing the next major transaction, elite gentlemen founders should ask themselves three questions:

1. Am I endangering the existing company’s liquidity?

If something goes wrong, do I still have at least one year of cash to cover wages, bills and suppliers?

2. Do I genuinely understand the business I’m entering?

Have I performed the due diligence, and do I understand what I’m diversifying into rather than merely understanding the projected return?

3. Do I have the right people beside me to build it?

Especially when entering something new, have I surrounded myself with people who understand what I don’t?

You spent decades creating the fortune.

The next opportunity should have to fit inside the principles that protect it.

BEFORE YOU GO
9–10 Figure Scale Starts Here »

Jasmine & Donal Kelleher | Quantum Mogul

SCHEDULE: your Empire Audit Call to see exactly where money, margin, and deal flow are being lost—so you can scale faster with full control.

SECURE: the Sovereign Shift Report diagnostic to discover exactly in what areas you’re still the bottleneck in your business—and what to install instead, to step out of the engine room and unlock 9–10 figure growth.

SUBSCRIBE: to the private Quantum Mogul Wealth Podcast to grow your empire and your wealth the way smart billionaires do—access the deal logic, leverage, and thinking behind debt-free expansion and multi-generational wealth.

Mogul Meter

Weigh In: How Was This Week's Wealth Intel?

Login or Subscribe to participate